AUTONEWS

Some US transit systems weigh whether to run trains without a human at the controls

Even as automated vehicles such as robotaxis grow more prevalent in the U.S., almost every mass transit system still requires a driver or operator on board. Two major cities are seeking to change that.

The future of rail is automated...The rail industry needs innovative solutions that address the challenges of growing urbanisation, climate change and other factors putting pressure on public transport.

That is why we are championing the push towards automated train operation from metro to heavy rail solutions. Equipped with digital tools, cutting edge sensors, powerful software, and deep experience in driverless transport, Alstom is at the forefront of the development of autonomous systems and has its eye set on making the highest automation level, GoA4, on regional train lines a reality.

What is Autonomous Mobility? Autonomous Mobility or Automatic Train Operation is an operational and safety enhancement in rail. It takes the guesswork, human error, and variables out of railways, making them more efficient, accurate, and reliable than ever. Combined with systems like Automatic Train Control, Automatic Train Protection and Automatic Train Supervision, these systems enable operators to do more with less, orchestrating their fleets and turning them into a finely-tuned network that performs better with less waste and risk. Alstom brings the industry’s broadest portfolio and deepest experience: Over 50 systems worldwide and driverless operation experience that stretches back to the 1970s.

Officials in Washington, D.C., recently advanced a plan that could let computers fully control one of its subways, and Los Angeles is seeking to build a new, completely automated line. Honolulu already has one.

The Washington and LA projects, which would take years to implement and still face financial and technical hurdles, come amid an already fierce debate over the safety risks and benefits of automated trains and whether the substantial upfront expense is worth the long-term savings in labor costs.

Supporters call the push long overdue, pointing out that American cities lag far behind numerous places across the world that run unattended subways, metros or buses, including several cities in Europe and Asia, as well as major systems in Canada, Australia, South America and the Middle East.

“It should be much harder to automate something that’s on-road, that has all of these various obstacles coming at it, compared to a fixed-rail system,” said Baruch Feigenbaum, senior managing director of transportation policy at the Reason Foundation, a libertarian think tank that has advocated for transit automation. “I don’t know a nice way to say this, but basically the transit world is where innovation goes to die.”

Only in recent years have on-road vehicles from such companies as Waymo,Tesla and Zoox taken the automation lead in the U.S. ahead of transit systems using a track. In fact, although operators have always been part of the Metro subway system in Washington, D.C., trains ran with some automated features when it opened 50 years ago. After a 2009 fatal crash, those were turned off, then restored over the past two years.

Now, officials in the nation's capital have renewed their push for automation on Metro's Red Line. And an environmental review is underway in Los Angeles for an automated track for a new underground line of its heavy-rail system that would cut through the rough terrain of the Santa Monica Mountains.

Honolulu is already running an elevated driverless line — the most expansive automated transit system in the U.S. It'll stretch 19 miles when completed, surpassing the elevated driverless trains Detroit and Miami opened as pilot projects in the 1980s, a monorail connecting hotels on the Las Vegas Strip, and smaller systems that carry passengers between airport terminals.

An automated monorail that once ran in Memphis, Tennessee, closed down years ago. And the driverless Jacksonville Skyway will indefinitely halt operations soon due to budget cuts, despite initial plans for an even larger automated system.

After nine people were killed and many others injured in the 2009 train collision near the Fort Totten station on the D.C. Red Line, the National Transportation Safety Board blamed the crash on a maintenance problem in the automated signaling system that separates trains from one another.

Randy Clarke, CEO of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, pointed out in an interview with The Associated Press that the issue in Fort Totten had nothing to do with the cruise control-like system that was restored on the Red Line in 2024 and the other Metro lines last year. Still, he acknowledged that for many years the crash “paralyzed” Metro's plans for further automation.

“That was a big failure, there’s no question. We do not do anything like that now,” said Clarke, who called the current system “highly regulated, highly documented, very proficient.”

Trains could conceivably run without a human worker inside the cab as early as 2033 under the nearly $1 billion plan Metro's Board of Directors backed in April to upgrade the Red Line with safety features including protective barriers that prevent passengers from getting onto the tracks.

Clarke said that even if workers aren't needed to physically run the trains, they will be needed to maintain the tracks and respond to emergencies.

Unions have been critics of automation. John Samuelsen, a former worker in the New York subway system who now serves as international president of the Transport Workers Union, said unions have fought off automation efforts in New York and elsewhere, calling them “a catastrophe waiting to happen.”

“Passengers will be left dealing with a self-evacuation, which is a disaster in a system which runs on a third rail,” Samuelsen said.

To alleviate massive traffic bottlenecks for commuters, Honolulu opened its Skyline automated light metro transit system three years ago and expanded it last year.

Vance Tsuda, the system's project director, said there hasn't been a single crash or injury associated with automation. Even hybrid systems are less safe than a completely automated one, he said, arguing that a human is far more likely to overlook something like an open door and prematurely clear a train for departure.

“If you have somebody making that decision, they could make a wrong decision,” Tsuda said.

But David King, an associate professor of urban planning at Arizona State University who has researched automated transportation, said the success rate has to remain perfect to keep the public trust. That's why the Fort Totten crash and others involving automation put the technology so far behind, he said.

“We allow a certain amount of failure with private industry that we don’t tolerate when the state does it,” said King, citing the several rockets blown up by Elon Musk's SpaceX — a record he argues would cripple NASA's budget if it happened in the public sector.

Perhaps the most ambitious transit automation effort being pursued in the U.S. is the subway line Los Angeles officials voted to recommend beneath the Santa Monica Mountains. The area is one of the most notorious traffic headaches in the country, with the mountains dividing the bustling Westside employment hub from the San Fernando Valley.

There's already a subway system under the same mountain range near Hollywood, but that one has a driver onboard. The new proposal, which is undergoing an environmental review, would use shorter, more frequent trains, said Cecily Way, who oversees planning for the Sepulveda Project for LA Metro.

Like the project in Washington, the new line in Los Angeles would feature station doors to protect passengers on the platform from oncoming trains.

Feigenbaum with the Reason Foundation said that automation of a major transit line such as in Los Angeles or Washington could open the floodgates for other cities to follow.

“It sends a signal that this is technologically doable and this is something that maybe other systems are going to want to strive for,” he said.

Are automated trains already a reality...Yes, automated and driverless trains are already a reality in closed or semi-controlled environments, though full automation on open, mixed-traffic main lines remains rare.

Where automated trains exist today:

• Urban Metros and Subways: Fully automated, driverless trains operate daily in cities around the world, including Singapore, Dubai, Paris, Tokyo, Copenhagen, and Nuremberg, as well as Honolulu's Skyline system in the U.S.. These systems use Communication-Based Train Control (CBTC) and closed tracks with platform screen doors.

• Heavy Freight Systems: Long-distance automated freight trains transport iron ore in remote areas like Western Australia.

• Grades of Automation (GoA): Rail automation is divided into distinct levels:

• GoA 2 (Semi-Automatic): The train starts and stops automatically, but a driver stays onboard to manage doors and emergencies (such as Hamburg's S-Bahn).

• GoA 3 (Driverless): Automated driving with a train attendant present.

• GoA 4 (Unattended): Completely driverless operation with no staff on board.

Why open-line automation is limited:

• Complex Crossings and Unfenced Tracks: Standard rail lines feature open grade crossings, pedestrians, and wildlife, making split-second obstacle detection far more challenging than in a sealed subway tunnel.

• Legacy Infrastructure: Upgrading 19th-century tracks, signaling, and positive train control systems is extremely expensive.

• Safety and Union Pushback: Labor unions frequently oppose full automation due to safety, emergency evacuation, and job-loss concerns, especially following historical accidents like the 2009 Washington D.C. Metro crash

Trains operate without a human at the controls using Automatic Train Operation (ATO) systems paired with centralized computer controls and specialized track technology.

Key technologies:

• Automatic Train Operation (ATO): This onboard computer subsystem handles starting, acceleration, speed adjustment, coasting, and stopping.

• Automatic Train Protection (ATP): This safety mechanism monitors speed limits and automatically applies the brakes if the train exceeds safe parameters.

• Automatic Train Control (ATC): This layer combines ATO and ATP to manage overall network flow and adjust to real-time changes.

• Communications-Based Train Control (CBTC): This wireless system lets trains talk to trackside equipment and other trains in real time, tracking exact positions down to centimeters and keeping safe distances (known as "moving blocks").

• Sensors and Track Hardware: Systems use transponders, beacons, radar, lidar, and cameras to check speed, wheel rotation, and obstacles. Platform screen doors are also often used to keep people and objects off the tracks.

Grades of automation (GoA):

Driverless or unmanned trains are classified by the International Association of Public Transport into distinct levels detailed on the Automatic Train Operation - Wikipedia page:

• GoA1 (Manual): A driver controls the train with basic electronic help.

• GoA2 (Semi-Automatic): The train starts and stops automatically, but a human driver is present to handle doors and emergencies (common in many subways).

• GoA3 (Driverless): The train runs automatically, but an attendant or staff member is on board for doors and manual takeover.

• GoA4 (Unattended/Fully Automated): The train runs completely without staff on board, controlled remotely from a central operations room.

Reason Foundation